Home   News   Article

Further plans to redevelop former Co-op department store in Bishop's Stortford




A fourth attempt to breathe new life into a Bishop’s Stortford town centre landmark is being considered by East Herts Council.

New proposals for 19 homes and space for uses including shops, restaurants, a gym, health centre or crèche have been submitted for the former Co-op department store on the corner of South Street and Station Road.

In the latest instalment of a four-year planning saga, Sun & Harrow Ltd wants to reconfigure the ground floor for commercial use and use the first floor for eight studio homes, a two-bedroom apartment and a one-bedroom flat.

The building on the junction of Station Road and South Street. Pic: Vikki Lince
The building on the junction of Station Road and South Street. Pic: Vikki Lince

It wants to add a third storey to the premises, built in 1958 as a headquarters for the Co-op, to provide two further studio homes, one two-bedroom and six one-bedroom flats.

In 2019, planning permission was granted for flexible commercial use of the ground and first floors with nine homes on a new second floor. Then in 2020 it won approval for proposals to create a headquarters office building, again with a new second floor.

In April 2021, the site was auctioned with an estimate of £2.2m but failed to sell.

A new blueprint for the building was then submitted to use the ground floor as one commercial, business or service unit with 20 homes upstairs: 10 studio flats and a one-bedroom property on the first floor and two apartments, six one-bed flats and a two-bed home on a new second storey.

When the town council scrutinised this scheme, Cllr Bob Taylor likened it to tenement buildings of the 1950s, Cllr Richard Townsend said it was akin to a hostel and Cllr Dave Anderson compared the size of the studios to trying to “swing a cat in a shoebox”. Ultimately it was rejected by East Herts Council.

Hybrid Planning & Development Ltd, Sun & Harrow’s agent, cited Covid-19 and a drop in demand for office space as a reason for the repeated revisions and claimed the latest provided “a positive future for the building which otherwise blights the Conservation Area”.



This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More